Featured Posts
- Urgent Hospital Readmissions are Avoidable in Nearly One out of Five Cases
- Medical Malpractice Risk Perception at Odds with the Reality
- Patients Need to Act Promptly in a Medical Mapractice Case
- Long-Term Care and Nursing Home Legislation Mandates Health Care and Prohibits Neglect and Abuse
- Recent Study Finds Doctors Unrevealing About Treatment Options
- Higher Standards in Hospital Policies
- Whither Medical Malpractice Compensation
-
Recent Posts
- Chronic Pain Injury Compensation
- Patient Ombudsman of Ontario A New Complaint Process
- Recent Medical Malpractice Case Shows What Can Happen When You Don’t Have A Lawyer
- Medical Malpractice Law Firms Owe a Duty of Loyalty
- Misdiagnosis of Cancer Cases Amount to 1 in 10 Settlements
- Medical Error Caused by Prevalent and Pervasive Surgeon Fatigue
- Medical Malpractice Claims Studied for Litigation Rate
- Rate of Prescribing Errors in General Practice Revealed
- Pathology Errors Continue at Windsor Hospitals
- Misdiagnosed Patient
- Consequences of Bariatric Surgery Malpractice
- Measures of Hospital Safety are Incomplete
- Wrong Level Spine Surgery
- Medical Negligence Claims Shown to Improve Patient Safety
- Nine Types of Pharmacist Negligence
- Twelve Hospital Negligence Errors
- A Survival Guide to Obstetrical Malpractice for 2012 at the Mount Sinai Hospital
- Failure to Diagnose Cancer Cases Explained
- Urgent Hospital Readmissions are Avoidable in Nearly One out of Five Cases
- Medical Malpractice Risk Perception at Odds with the Reality
- Teaching Medical Malpractice Advocacy at the University of Toronto
- Medical Device Approval Process Is Defective
- Medical Errors Continue to Harm Patients According to a New Study
- Urological Medical Malpractice
- Lung Cancer and Medical Malpractice
- Wrong Site Surgery Increases After the Introduction of the Universal Protocol
- Practical Car Accident Tips
- Patients Need to Act Promptly in a Medical Mapractice Case
- Sudbury Regional Hospital Emergency Department Performance Worsening
- Long-Term Care and Nursing Home Legislation Mandates Health Care and Prohibits Neglect and Abuse
- Surgeons and Referring Physicians are Responsible for Wrong Site and Patient Procedures
- Recent Study Finds Doctors Unrevealing About Treatment Options
- Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Require Expert Opinion Evidence before Trial
- Gastric Banding Concerns for Teenagers
- Cataracts Lead to Diagnostic Errors
- Drug Side Effect Reporting
- The Elderly Continue to be at Risk from Anti-Psychotic Medication
- Champix Safety Brought into Question
- Surgeons Can Do More to Reduce the Risk of Infection
- Never Events Responsible for Every Sixth Claim
- Chelation Study Suspended
- Joint Commission Alert: Prevent Blood Thinner Deaths and Overdoses: Anticoagulant therapy linked to high rate of errors
- Antibiotic use in pregnancy linked to cerebral palsy
- Canada’s health care fares poorly when compared to Western Europe
- The Vulnerable Hurt by Caps on Medical Malpractice Claims
- Vaccine Risk Declarations and Nurses
- Loss of Chance in the Medical Case Alive in Massachusetts
- Higher Standards in Hospital Policies
- Drug Safety
- Promotion of Patient’s Rights of Regulatory Concern
Ways To Connect
Categories
A Survival Guide to Obstetrical Malpractice for 2012 at the Mount Sinai Hospital
Avoiding Obstetrical Malpractice
I recently attended a day seminar presented by the obstetricians at the Mount Sinai Hospital. This is an annual event that has become a mecca of sorts for physicians, obstetrical nurses and medical malpractice lawyers who this year packed the hospital’s auditorium. This blog post shares its title with the seminar which is a misnomer. The seminar has very little to do with surviving an obstetrical malpractice case. Its focus is on emerging issues that health care professionals should be made aware of so that they will not find themselves subjected to medical malpractice cases. This year the presentations provided in depth coverage of a number of issues affecting the standard of practice in obstetrics.
Obstetrical Malpractice Issues
The screening, diagnosis and management of parvovirus infection was examined in detail. Congenital parvovirus infection in the pregnant mother can cause fetal anemia. It is at greater risk of contraction when it is in an endemic phase with nursery and other teachers as well as mothers with multiple children being at greater risk of infection than the general population. It is dangerous as it can lead to intrauterine fetal demise or to fetal hydrops.
Another discussion occurred concerning the use of magnesium sulphate for the neuroprotection of the fetus. The medical evidence suggests that magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) given before anticipated early preterm birth reduces the risk of cerebral palsy in surviving infants. it in fact it significantly increases the chances that the child will not need assistance with walking when he or she has reached the age of two. Its use increases the chance of a surviving child being free of gross motor dysfunction by almost 8 per cent. This could result in saving a lifetime care cost of a million dollars versus a cost of $65 for the treatment. There was some debate as to whether the failure to provide this treatment would attract liability to pay damages in a medical malpractice case as the chance of a materially better outcome did not approach 50 per cent.
There was also a very technical discussion on the screening and diagnostic testing of women at the greatest risk for placental dysfunction. This was a very technical discussion but quite important for the management of pregnancies of nulliparous women.
Timing of Delivery and Birth Asphxia: The Concerns of the Medical Malpractice Lawyers
A considerable amount of time was spent on these very important issues. There was a lively discussion by the doctors on the safety of vaginal birth after cesarean section delivery (VBAC) and the risk factors involved in intervention. Interestingly VBAC was a much more common choice for mothers in Canada as compared to the U.S. where physicians do not seem so keen to perform them. The presenting lawyers discussed the adequacy of the SOGC guidelines on birth asphxia and also reviewed recent obstetrical malpractice cases that had implications for the conduct of fetal heart rate monitoring.
If you have concerns over the management of your labour and delivery, you may have a case for medical negligence or medical malpractice. Contact our office the Obradovich Law firm for a free consultation using the case evaluation form or calling our toll free number. There is no fee or obligation for our case evaluation by an experienced Toronto medical malpractice lawyer.