Featured Posts
- Urgent Hospital Readmissions are Avoidable in Nearly One out of Five Cases
- Medical Malpractice Risk Perception at Odds with the Reality
- Patients Need to Act Promptly in a Medical Mapractice Case
- Long-Term Care and Nursing Home Legislation Mandates Health Care and Prohibits Neglect and Abuse
- Recent Study Finds Doctors Unrevealing About Treatment Options
- Higher Standards in Hospital Policies
- Whither Medical Malpractice Compensation
-
Recent Posts
- Chronic Pain Injury Compensation
- Patient Ombudsman of Ontario A New Complaint Process
- Recent Medical Malpractice Case Shows What Can Happen When You Don’t Have A Lawyer
- Medical Malpractice Law Firms Owe a Duty of Loyalty
- Misdiagnosis of Cancer Cases Amount to 1 in 10 Settlements
- Medical Error Caused by Prevalent and Pervasive Surgeon Fatigue
- Medical Malpractice Claims Studied for Litigation Rate
- Rate of Prescribing Errors in General Practice Revealed
- Pathology Errors Continue at Windsor Hospitals
- Misdiagnosed Patient
- Consequences of Bariatric Surgery Malpractice
- Measures of Hospital Safety are Incomplete
- Wrong Level Spine Surgery
- Medical Negligence Claims Shown to Improve Patient Safety
- Nine Types of Pharmacist Negligence
- Twelve Hospital Negligence Errors
- A Survival Guide to Obstetrical Malpractice for 2012 at the Mount Sinai Hospital
- Failure to Diagnose Cancer Cases Explained
- Urgent Hospital Readmissions are Avoidable in Nearly One out of Five Cases
- Medical Malpractice Risk Perception at Odds with the Reality
- Teaching Medical Malpractice Advocacy at the University of Toronto
- Medical Device Approval Process Is Defective
- Medical Errors Continue to Harm Patients According to a New Study
- Urological Medical Malpractice
- Lung Cancer and Medical Malpractice
- Wrong Site Surgery Increases After the Introduction of the Universal Protocol
- Practical Car Accident Tips
- Patients Need to Act Promptly in a Medical Mapractice Case
- Sudbury Regional Hospital Emergency Department Performance Worsening
- Long-Term Care and Nursing Home Legislation Mandates Health Care and Prohibits Neglect and Abuse
- Surgeons and Referring Physicians are Responsible for Wrong Site and Patient Procedures
- Recent Study Finds Doctors Unrevealing About Treatment Options
- Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Require Expert Opinion Evidence before Trial
- Gastric Banding Concerns for Teenagers
- Cataracts Lead to Diagnostic Errors
- Drug Side Effect Reporting
- The Elderly Continue to be at Risk from Anti-Psychotic Medication
- Champix Safety Brought into Question
- Surgeons Can Do More to Reduce the Risk of Infection
- Never Events Responsible for Every Sixth Claim
- Chelation Study Suspended
- Joint Commission Alert: Prevent Blood Thinner Deaths and Overdoses: Anticoagulant therapy linked to high rate of errors
- Antibiotic use in pregnancy linked to cerebral palsy
- Canada’s health care fares poorly when compared to Western Europe
- The Vulnerable Hurt by Caps on Medical Malpractice Claims
- Vaccine Risk Declarations and Nurses
- Loss of Chance in the Medical Case Alive in Massachusetts
- Higher Standards in Hospital Policies
- Drug Safety
- Promotion of Patient’s Rights of Regulatory Concern
Ways To Connect
Categories
Medical Malpractice Claims Studied for Litigation Rate
A new study of medical malpractice claims in the United States published online May 14 in the Archives of Internal Medicine reveals similarities with the Canadian experience.
According to the results of the claims that go to court most are ultimately decided in the physician’s favour. Another finding was that litigated medical malpractice claims often take months or years to be resolved. These are both fundamental truths of medical malpractice litigation in Canada
The researchers sorted through data from all 50 US states for the years 2002 through 2005 and analysed 10,056 malpractice claims that resulted in defense costs. They calculated the number of medical malpractice claims resulting in litigation and determined how those claims were resolved by specialty. They also analysed how long it took to resolve various types of claims.
The Rate and Success of Litigated Medical Malpractice Claims
They found that 55.2% of medical malpractice claims that required some defense cost led to litigation.
The rate of litigation ranged from 46.7% for anesthesiologists to 62.6% for obstetricians and gynecologists. Approximately 53% of claims against internists and medicine-based sub-specialists resulted in litigation.
Plaintiffs were more likely to be unsuccessful in litigation, as 54.1% of all cases were dismissed. The rate of dismissal showed a wide variance. It was highest for cases brought against internists and medicine-based sub-specialists (61.5%) and lowest for cases against pathologists (36.5%).
In cases involving internists and pathologists, just more than a third of litigated claims ended up being resolved before a verdict was reached by the court. In contrast, the proportion of claims settled before a verdict was 49.6% for pathologists.
Only 4.5% of the litigated medical malpractice claims were ultimately decided by a trial verdict. Pathologists were involved the most frequently in a trial as 7.4% of those cases went to a verdict. This is contrasted to a low of 2.0% for anaesthesiologists and 2.7% for internists and medicine-based sub-specialists.
The clear majority of cases (79.6 %) that did progress to a final verdict were decided in favor of the defendant. This a statistic that is slightly better for plaintiffs in the United States than in Canada were generally speaking 90% of the cases decided at trial result in a verdict for the defendant. Practically speaking there may be little difference as the sample size of cases proceeding to trial in Canada is much smaller than that reviewed in the study.
Medical Malpractice Claims Take a Long Time to be Resolved
Whether litigated or not medical malpractice claims take a long time to be resolved. The mean time required to resolve claims was 19.0 months, which included 11.6 months for nonlitigated claims and 25.1 months for litigated claims.
Naturally claims that proceeded to trial took even longer. For cases decided at trial the mean duration was 39.0 months for cases decided in favor of the defendants and 43.5 months for cases decided in favor of the plaintiffs. This is an interesting variance that is most likely attributable to defence tactics in searching out witnesses and theories in claims that are indefensible.
The authors from the Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Harvard Medical School, Boston concluded that “The substantial portion of litigated claims that are not dismissed in court and the length of time required to resolve litigated claims more generally may help explain why malpractice claims undergoing litigation are an important source of concern to physicians.”
Arch Intern Med. Published online May 14, 2012.