Featured Posts
- Urgent Hospital Readmissions are Avoidable in Nearly One out of Five Cases
- Medical Malpractice Risk Perception at Odds with the Reality
- Patients Need to Act Promptly in a Medical Mapractice Case
- Long-Term Care and Nursing Home Legislation Mandates Health Care and Prohibits Neglect and Abuse
- Recent Study Finds Doctors Unrevealing About Treatment Options
- Higher Standards in Hospital Policies
- Whither Medical Malpractice Compensation
-
Recent Posts
- Chronic Pain Injury Compensation
- Patient Ombudsman of Ontario A New Complaint Process
- Recent Medical Malpractice Case Shows What Can Happen When You Don’t Have A Lawyer
- Medical Malpractice Law Firms Owe a Duty of Loyalty
- Misdiagnosis of Cancer Cases Amount to 1 in 10 Settlements
- Medical Error Caused by Prevalent and Pervasive Surgeon Fatigue
- Medical Malpractice Claims Studied for Litigation Rate
- Rate of Prescribing Errors in General Practice Revealed
- Pathology Errors Continue at Windsor Hospitals
- Misdiagnosed Patient
- Consequences of Bariatric Surgery Malpractice
- Measures of Hospital Safety are Incomplete
- Wrong Level Spine Surgery
- Medical Negligence Claims Shown to Improve Patient Safety
- Nine Types of Pharmacist Negligence
- Twelve Hospital Negligence Errors
- A Survival Guide to Obstetrical Malpractice for 2012 at the Mount Sinai Hospital
- Failure to Diagnose Cancer Cases Explained
- Urgent Hospital Readmissions are Avoidable in Nearly One out of Five Cases
- Medical Malpractice Risk Perception at Odds with the Reality
- Teaching Medical Malpractice Advocacy at the University of Toronto
- Medical Device Approval Process Is Defective
- Medical Errors Continue to Harm Patients According to a New Study
- Urological Medical Malpractice
- Lung Cancer and Medical Malpractice
- Wrong Site Surgery Increases After the Introduction of the Universal Protocol
- Practical Car Accident Tips
- Patients Need to Act Promptly in a Medical Mapractice Case
- Sudbury Regional Hospital Emergency Department Performance Worsening
- Long-Term Care and Nursing Home Legislation Mandates Health Care and Prohibits Neglect and Abuse
- Surgeons and Referring Physicians are Responsible for Wrong Site and Patient Procedures
- Recent Study Finds Doctors Unrevealing About Treatment Options
- Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Require Expert Opinion Evidence before Trial
- Gastric Banding Concerns for Teenagers
- Cataracts Lead to Diagnostic Errors
- Drug Side Effect Reporting
- The Elderly Continue to be at Risk from Anti-Psychotic Medication
- Champix Safety Brought into Question
- Surgeons Can Do More to Reduce the Risk of Infection
- Never Events Responsible for Every Sixth Claim
- Chelation Study Suspended
- Joint Commission Alert: Prevent Blood Thinner Deaths and Overdoses: Anticoagulant therapy linked to high rate of errors
- Antibiotic use in pregnancy linked to cerebral palsy
- Canada’s health care fares poorly when compared to Western Europe
- The Vulnerable Hurt by Caps on Medical Malpractice Claims
- Vaccine Risk Declarations and Nurses
- Loss of Chance in the Medical Case Alive in Massachusetts
- Higher Standards in Hospital Policies
- Drug Safety
- Promotion of Patient’s Rights of Regulatory Concern
Ways To Connect
Categories
Medical Errors Continue to Harm Patients According to a New Study
Researchers have published in the New England Journal of Medicine the results of a study taken to determine whether efforts to reduce medical errors at national, regional, and local levels have translated into significant improvements in the overall safety of patients in hospitals.
In December 1999, the Institute of Medicine reported that medical errors cause up to 98,000 deaths and more than 1 million injuries each year in the United States. For more information concerning that study and others please refer to our medical adverse event studies page. In response to these findings, accreditation bodies, payers, non-profit organizations, governments, and hospitals launched major initiatives and invested considerable resources to improve patient safety.
The researchers sought to clarify whether these efforts in fact altered the rate of patient injury in hospital. They elected to study the rate of harm in North Carolina as it was a state that was likely to have improvement, since it had shown a high level of engagement in efforts to improve patient safety.
The study reviewed the records of 2341 admissions from study hospitals. A total of 588 harms were identified for a rate of 25.1 harms per 100 admissions. The harms suffered by patients were a consequence of procedures (186), medications (162), nosocomial (hospital acquired) infections (87), other therapies (59), diagnostic evaluations (7), and falls (5), and other causes.
The reviewers found that 63.1 % of the harms were preventable. The large majority of these were temporary but required either intervention or prolonged hospitalization. However of the identified preventable harms, 13 caused permanent harm, 35 were life-threatening, and 9 caused or contributed to a patient’s death. There was also no significant change over time in the rate of harms.
By our calculation almost 1% of hospital admissions will result in a condition of permanent harm or death that was preventable. This is an alarming statistic and underlines the need for focused efforts to reduce discrete harms, such as nosocomial infections and surgical complications, which have been shown can significantly improve safety. It also unfortunately means that patients will continue to need access to financial compensation for injuries that result from breaches in the standard of care or malpractice.