Featured Posts
- Urgent Hospital Readmissions are Avoidable in Nearly One out of Five Cases
- Medical Malpractice Risk Perception at Odds with the Reality
- Patients Need to Act Promptly in a Medical Mapractice Case
- Long-Term Care and Nursing Home Legislation Mandates Health Care and Prohibits Neglect and Abuse
- Recent Study Finds Doctors Unrevealing About Treatment Options
- Higher Standards in Hospital Policies
- Whither Medical Malpractice Compensation
-
Recent Posts
- Chronic Pain Injury Compensation
- Patient Ombudsman of Ontario A New Complaint Process
- Recent Medical Malpractice Case Shows What Can Happen When You Don’t Have A Lawyer
- Medical Malpractice Law Firms Owe a Duty of Loyalty
- Misdiagnosis of Cancer Cases Amount to 1 in 10 Settlements
- Medical Error Caused by Prevalent and Pervasive Surgeon Fatigue
- Medical Malpractice Claims Studied for Litigation Rate
- Rate of Prescribing Errors in General Practice Revealed
- Pathology Errors Continue at Windsor Hospitals
- Misdiagnosed Patient
- Consequences of Bariatric Surgery Malpractice
- Measures of Hospital Safety are Incomplete
- Wrong Level Spine Surgery
- Medical Negligence Claims Shown to Improve Patient Safety
- Nine Types of Pharmacist Negligence
- Twelve Hospital Negligence Errors
- A Survival Guide to Obstetrical Malpractice for 2012 at the Mount Sinai Hospital
- Failure to Diagnose Cancer Cases Explained
- Urgent Hospital Readmissions are Avoidable in Nearly One out of Five Cases
- Medical Malpractice Risk Perception at Odds with the Reality
- Teaching Medical Malpractice Advocacy at the University of Toronto
- Medical Device Approval Process Is Defective
- Medical Errors Continue to Harm Patients According to a New Study
- Urological Medical Malpractice
- Lung Cancer and Medical Malpractice
- Wrong Site Surgery Increases After the Introduction of the Universal Protocol
- Practical Car Accident Tips
- Patients Need to Act Promptly in a Medical Mapractice Case
- Sudbury Regional Hospital Emergency Department Performance Worsening
- Long-Term Care and Nursing Home Legislation Mandates Health Care and Prohibits Neglect and Abuse
- Surgeons and Referring Physicians are Responsible for Wrong Site and Patient Procedures
- Recent Study Finds Doctors Unrevealing About Treatment Options
- Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Require Expert Opinion Evidence before Trial
- Gastric Banding Concerns for Teenagers
- Cataracts Lead to Diagnostic Errors
- Drug Side Effect Reporting
- The Elderly Continue to be at Risk from Anti-Psychotic Medication
- Champix Safety Brought into Question
- Surgeons Can Do More to Reduce the Risk of Infection
- Never Events Responsible for Every Sixth Claim
- Chelation Study Suspended
- Joint Commission Alert: Prevent Blood Thinner Deaths and Overdoses: Anticoagulant therapy linked to high rate of errors
- Antibiotic use in pregnancy linked to cerebral palsy
- Canada’s health care fares poorly when compared to Western Europe
- The Vulnerable Hurt by Caps on Medical Malpractice Claims
- Vaccine Risk Declarations and Nurses
- Loss of Chance in the Medical Case Alive in Massachusetts
- Higher Standards in Hospital Policies
- Drug Safety
- Promotion of Patient’s Rights of Regulatory Concern
Ways To Connect
Categories
Measures of Hospital Safety are Incomplete
In an early release article viewpoint the Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ) has criticized the usefulness of data collected by the the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). The CIHI has been operating since 1994. It is effectively a partnership of federal and provincial governments. Its mandate is to develop and maintain databases of comprehensive and integrated health information. The information is to be used to assist in creation of health policy and to improve health system management. The ultimate goal is improved health care for Canadians.
The main criticism is that CIHI is not measuring hospital-acquired infection rates. This is a sensitive topic as Canada has one of the worst hospital infection rates (11.6%) among developed countries, according to a 2011 World Health Organization report on the burden of endemic health care-associated infections. By contrast, the WHO reports that Germany’s rate is 3.6%, while that of France is 4.4%. The article argues that any accurate measure of patient safety within Canadian hospitals should include hospital-acquired infection rates.
Another important indicator that CIHI is not tracking is the rate of medication error within hospitals. According to Linda Wilhelm of the Best Medicines Coalition by current estimates only 1% to 10% of adverse drug reactions are reported in Canada. Medication errors and reactions should be tracked in measuring hospital performance given the fact that medication errors and adverse drug reactions represent a significant cost to the health care system. We have already commented on the important topics of medication error and adverse drug reactions on our compensation for medication errors page.
The rather lame response of the CIHI to these criticisms is that “the relative lack of clinical detail within administrative data and coding irregularities continue to pose an obstacle to compiling comparable statistics on patient safety.” As CIHI approaches its twentieth anniversary one would think that it has had ample time to develop standards for the collection of infection rates and incorrect administration of medication.