Featured Posts
- Urgent Hospital Readmissions are Avoidable in Nearly One out of Five Cases
- Medical Malpractice Risk Perception at Odds with the Reality
- Patients Need to Act Promptly in a Medical Mapractice Case
- Long-Term Care and Nursing Home Legislation Mandates Health Care and Prohibits Neglect and Abuse
- Recent Study Finds Doctors Unrevealing About Treatment Options
- Higher Standards in Hospital Policies
- Whither Medical Malpractice Compensation
-
Recent Posts
- Chronic Pain Injury Compensation
- Patient Ombudsman of Ontario A New Complaint Process
- Recent Medical Malpractice Case Shows What Can Happen When You Don’t Have A Lawyer
- Medical Malpractice Law Firms Owe a Duty of Loyalty
- Misdiagnosis of Cancer Cases Amount to 1 in 10 Settlements
- Medical Error Caused by Prevalent and Pervasive Surgeon Fatigue
- Medical Malpractice Claims Studied for Litigation Rate
- Rate of Prescribing Errors in General Practice Revealed
- Pathology Errors Continue at Windsor Hospitals
- Misdiagnosed Patient
- Consequences of Bariatric Surgery Malpractice
- Measures of Hospital Safety are Incomplete
- Wrong Level Spine Surgery
- Medical Negligence Claims Shown to Improve Patient Safety
- Nine Types of Pharmacist Negligence
- Twelve Hospital Negligence Errors
- A Survival Guide to Obstetrical Malpractice for 2012 at the Mount Sinai Hospital
- Failure to Diagnose Cancer Cases Explained
- Urgent Hospital Readmissions are Avoidable in Nearly One out of Five Cases
- Medical Malpractice Risk Perception at Odds with the Reality
- Teaching Medical Malpractice Advocacy at the University of Toronto
- Medical Device Approval Process Is Defective
- Medical Errors Continue to Harm Patients According to a New Study
- Urological Medical Malpractice
- Lung Cancer and Medical Malpractice
- Wrong Site Surgery Increases After the Introduction of the Universal Protocol
- Practical Car Accident Tips
- Patients Need to Act Promptly in a Medical Mapractice Case
- Sudbury Regional Hospital Emergency Department Performance Worsening
- Long-Term Care and Nursing Home Legislation Mandates Health Care and Prohibits Neglect and Abuse
- Surgeons and Referring Physicians are Responsible for Wrong Site and Patient Procedures
- Recent Study Finds Doctors Unrevealing About Treatment Options
- Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Require Expert Opinion Evidence before Trial
- Gastric Banding Concerns for Teenagers
- Cataracts Lead to Diagnostic Errors
- Drug Side Effect Reporting
- The Elderly Continue to be at Risk from Anti-Psychotic Medication
- Champix Safety Brought into Question
- Surgeons Can Do More to Reduce the Risk of Infection
- Never Events Responsible for Every Sixth Claim
- Chelation Study Suspended
- Joint Commission Alert: Prevent Blood Thinner Deaths and Overdoses: Anticoagulant therapy linked to high rate of errors
- Antibiotic use in pregnancy linked to cerebral palsy
- Canada’s health care fares poorly when compared to Western Europe
- The Vulnerable Hurt by Caps on Medical Malpractice Claims
- Vaccine Risk Declarations and Nurses
- Loss of Chance in the Medical Case Alive in Massachusetts
- Higher Standards in Hospital Policies
- Drug Safety
- Promotion of Patient’s Rights of Regulatory Concern
Ways To Connect
Categories
Recent Medical Malpractice Case Shows What Can Happen When You Don’t Have A Lawyer
A recent case affirms the necessity of having expert medical opinion in support of a medical malpractice action. It also provides an example of the difficulty in bringing a lawsuit without a lawyer. As the Court remarked this was a complex medical malpractice case.
The doctors of a wife and mother of a family diagnosed her with terminal brain cancer. The doctors treated her with a drug used to reduce the cerebral swelling associated with brain tumours.
After she died the husband sued her doctors and the hospital. He claimed that the drug was terminated without tapering off. He also claimed that informed consent to its use was not obtained as various risks were not disclosed.
A motions judge dismissed the case because of lack of expert evidence.The defendants had taken the position that the doctors had met the standard of care in their treatment. They also stated that the allegations against them were not the cause of death which was a result of the brain cancer. They supported their position with 3 expert reports in addition to their own evidence.
The husband represented himself. He appealed to the Ontario Court of Appeal which heard the case on January 20, 2017, Hirchberg v. Branson Drug Store, 2017 ONCA 62. The Court dismissed the appeal.
The husband was required to put forward all the necessary evidence to establish a genuine issue requiring a trial. This obligation required him to provide his own expert reports. The issues of standard of care and causation must be addressed by expert evidence.
The husband had filed declarations of a doctor providing information about the drug that was used and about what had happened in another case. The Court agreed that this doctor was not qualified to provide opinions on standard of care and causation. Furthermore his declarations did not address the particular circumstances of the case. By not having expert reports on the issues that needed to be addressed the husband failed to discharge his onus of proof.
On the issue of informed consent the husband also lost. The evidence showed that the wife and her powers of attorney for personal care were advised of the material risks of the drug and consented to its use. As well there was no conflict in the evidence that would require a trial.
Finally in dismissing the appeal the Court required the husband to pay $9000.00 in legal costs to the defendants.
The husband in this case would have benefited from the use of a lawyer. If he truly had no case, he presumably would have been advised not to proceed with the appeal. The cost of such advice would certainly be less than what the husband did pay out in legal costs to the defendants.
The Role of a Lawyer
Also a medical malpractice lawyer is able to review and analyze the merits of the action. A lawyer’s training and experience assists in this process. In analyzing a case the lawyer will:
Medical malpractice cases involve complex medical and legal issues. Therefore this is one of the areas of law where litigants will truly benefit from retaining a lawyer to advise and represent them.