Featured Posts
- Urgent Hospital Readmissions are Avoidable in Nearly One out of Five Cases
- Medical Malpractice Risk Perception at Odds with the Reality
- Patients Need to Act Promptly in a Medical Mapractice Case
- Long-Term Care and Nursing Home Legislation Mandates Health Care and Prohibits Neglect and Abuse
- Recent Study Finds Doctors Unrevealing About Treatment Options
- Higher Standards in Hospital Policies
- Whither Medical Malpractice Compensation
-
Recent Posts
- Chronic Pain Injury Compensation
- Patient Ombudsman of Ontario A New Complaint Process
- Recent Medical Malpractice Case Shows What Can Happen When You Don’t Have A Lawyer
- Medical Malpractice Law Firms Owe a Duty of Loyalty
- Misdiagnosis of Cancer Cases Amount to 1 in 10 Settlements
- Medical Error Caused by Prevalent and Pervasive Surgeon Fatigue
- Medical Malpractice Claims Studied for Litigation Rate
- Rate of Prescribing Errors in General Practice Revealed
- Pathology Errors Continue at Windsor Hospitals
- Misdiagnosed Patient
- Consequences of Bariatric Surgery Malpractice
- Measures of Hospital Safety are Incomplete
- Wrong Level Spine Surgery
- Medical Negligence Claims Shown to Improve Patient Safety
- Nine Types of Pharmacist Negligence
- Twelve Hospital Negligence Errors
- A Survival Guide to Obstetrical Malpractice for 2012 at the Mount Sinai Hospital
- Failure to Diagnose Cancer Cases Explained
- Urgent Hospital Readmissions are Avoidable in Nearly One out of Five Cases
- Medical Malpractice Risk Perception at Odds with the Reality
- Teaching Medical Malpractice Advocacy at the University of Toronto
- Medical Device Approval Process Is Defective
- Medical Errors Continue to Harm Patients According to a New Study
- Urological Medical Malpractice
- Lung Cancer and Medical Malpractice
- Wrong Site Surgery Increases After the Introduction of the Universal Protocol
- Practical Car Accident Tips
- Patients Need to Act Promptly in a Medical Mapractice Case
- Sudbury Regional Hospital Emergency Department Performance Worsening
- Long-Term Care and Nursing Home Legislation Mandates Health Care and Prohibits Neglect and Abuse
- Surgeons and Referring Physicians are Responsible for Wrong Site and Patient Procedures
- Recent Study Finds Doctors Unrevealing About Treatment Options
- Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Require Expert Opinion Evidence before Trial
- Gastric Banding Concerns for Teenagers
- Cataracts Lead to Diagnostic Errors
- Drug Side Effect Reporting
- The Elderly Continue to be at Risk from Anti-Psychotic Medication
- Champix Safety Brought into Question
- Surgeons Can Do More to Reduce the Risk of Infection
- Never Events Responsible for Every Sixth Claim
- Chelation Study Suspended
- Joint Commission Alert: Prevent Blood Thinner Deaths and Overdoses: Anticoagulant therapy linked to high rate of errors
- Antibiotic use in pregnancy linked to cerebral palsy
- Canada’s health care fares poorly when compared to Western Europe
- The Vulnerable Hurt by Caps on Medical Malpractice Claims
- Vaccine Risk Declarations and Nurses
- Loss of Chance in the Medical Case Alive in Massachusetts
- Higher Standards in Hospital Policies
- Drug Safety
- Promotion of Patient’s Rights of Regulatory Concern
Ways To Connect
Categories
Urgent Hospital Readmissions are Avoidable in Nearly One out of Five Cases
The Canadian Medical Association Journal has published a study of the causes of urgent hospital readmissions. The study was undertaken as urgent, unplanned hospital readmissions are increasingly being used to gauge the quality of care. The study team, comprised mainly of physicians, reviewed all urgent readmissions that occurred within 6 months of discharge from 11 teaching and community hospitals in Ontario between October 2002 and July 2006. The physicians adjudged whether the readmission was an adverse event and whether the adverse event could have been avoided. For purposes of the study an adverse event was defined as a poor clinical outcome due to medical care. For more information concerning medical adverse events please refer to our medical adverse event study page.
The study reviewed the history of almost 5000 patients of which 13.5 % were readmitted to hospital on an urgent basis within 6 months of their discharge. The study team concluded that 16 per cent of these patients were readmitted due to an outcome that was avoidable. The authors use the word “potentially” in describing this statistic but clearly report that they used a statistical model that required the probability that each readmission was truly avoidable exceeded 50%. Even then the vast majority of these occurrences had a 90% probability of being avoidable. From a legal perspective a probability exceeding 50% is sufficient to attract legal liability. The authors of the study chose to state that urgent readmissions that are potentially avoidable are relatively uncommon. However their analysis demonstrates that one out of 50 people admitted to hospital will require an urgent readmission to hospital within 6 months of discharge because of a poor outcome caused by medical care that was avoidable to a degree sufficient to affix legal liability. The study also showed that the closer in time the readmission was to the date of discharge the more likely that it was avoidable.