Featured Posts
- Urgent Hospital Readmissions are Avoidable in Nearly One out of Five Cases
- Medical Malpractice Risk Perception at Odds with the Reality
- Patients Need to Act Promptly in a Medical Mapractice Case
- Long-Term Care and Nursing Home Legislation Mandates Health Care and Prohibits Neglect and Abuse
- Recent Study Finds Doctors Unrevealing About Treatment Options
- Higher Standards in Hospital Policies
- Whither Medical Malpractice Compensation
-
Recent Posts
- Misdiagnosis of Cancer Cases Amount to 1 in 10 Settlements
- Medical Error Caused by Prevalent and Pervasive Surgeon Fatigue
- Medical Malpractice Claims Studied for Litigation Rate
- Rate of Prescribing Errors in General Practice Revealed
- Pathology Errors Continue at Windsor Hospitals
- Misdiagnosed Patient
- Consequences of Bariatric Surgery Malpractice
- Measures of Hospital Safety are Incomplete
- Wrong Level Spine Surgery
- Medical Negligence Claims Shown to Improve Patient Safety
- Nine Types of Pharmacist Negligence
- Twelve Hospital Negligence Errors
- A Survival Guide to Obstetrical Malpractice for 2012 at the Mount Sinai Hospital
- Failure to Diagnose Cancer Cases Explained
- Urgent Hospital Readmissions are Avoidable in Nearly One out of Five Cases
- Medical Malpractice Risk Perception at Odds with the Reality
- Teaching Medical Malpractice Advocacy at the University of Toronto
- Medical Device Approval Process Is Defective
- Medical Errors Continue to Harm Patients According to a New Study
- Urological Medical Malpractice
- Lung Cancer and Medical Malpractice
- Wrong Site Surgery Increases After the Introduction of the Universal Protocol
- Practical Car Accident Tips
- Patients Need to Act Promptly in a Medical Mapractice Case
- Sudbury Regional Hospital Emergency Department Performance Worsening
- Long-Term Care and Nursing Home Legislation Mandates Health Care and Prohibits Neglect and Abuse
- Surgeons and Referring Physicians are Responsible for Wrong Site and Patient Procedures
- Recent Study Finds Doctors Unrevealing About Treatment Options
- Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Require Expert Opinion Evidence before Trial
- Gastric Banding Concerns for Teenagers
- Cataracts Lead to Diagnostic Errors
- Drug Side Effect Reporting
- The Elderly Continue to be at Risk from Anti-Psychotic Medication
- Champix Safety Brought into Question
- Surgeons Can Do More to Reduce the Risk of Infection
- Never Events Responsible for Every Sixth Claim
- Chelation Study Suspended
- Joint Commission Alert: Prevent Blood Thinner Deaths and Overdoses: Anticoagulant therapy linked to high rate of errors
- Antibiotic use in pregnancy linked to cerebral palsy
- Canada’s health care fares poorly when compared to Western Europe
- The Vulnerable Hurt by Caps on Medical Malpractice Claims
- Vaccine Risk Declarations and Nurses
- Loss of Chance in the Medical Case Alive in Massachusetts
- Higher Standards in Hospital Policies
- Drug Safety
- Promotion of Patient’s Rights of Regulatory Concern
- Whither Medical Malpractice Compensation
- Medical Research Under Scrutiny
Ways To Connect
Categories
Drug Safety
The Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences in the United States issued a new report on September 22 2006 delivering a critical assessment of the US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) drug safety system. According to the IOM, there are at least 1.5 million preventable adverse drug events in the US each year and the true number may be much higher. The report, The future of drug safety: promoting and protecting the health of the public, makes several recommendations including tighter labeling requirements and advertising limits for newly approved medications, increased communication of information relating to marketed products’ risks and benefits and mandatory registration of clinical trial results and better public access to drug safety information.
The report comes at a time when Health Canada is undertaking a review to renew the Canadian federal drug regulatory system. Elements of the legislative and regulatory framework date back 50 years and are in need of modernisation. The 2003 federal budget allocated $190 million over five years to improve the timeliness of Health Canada’s regulatory processes with respect to human drugs. It aims to achieve significant improvements to drug review performance through the Therapeutics Access Strategy and through the National Pharmaceuticals Strategy to improve Canadians’ access to safe, effective, and affordable drugs through the health care system.
Lets hope for Canadians’ sake that the review will result in oversight of the drug approval process that acts at arm’s length from the pharmaceutical industry which has developed powerful marketing and public relations capabilities supported by the enormous cash flow created by drug sales. Particular emphasis should be placed on the need for clear labeling relating to instructions on use as well as risks.
A study report in the Annals of Internal Medicine found that many Americans, including those with college degrees, have trouble interpreting the instructions on prescription drug labels. Remarkably only 34.7 percent of people with lower literacy of grade level or below, interviewed for the study could determine the number of pills to take daily when faced with the instruction “take two tablets by mouth twice daily”. This only emphasizes the need for clear, simple instructions aided by visual cues to be standardized so that patients will receive consistent information as a minimum that does not vary by pharmacy or physician.
The conclusions of a U.S. government study published in the Oct. 18 2006 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association found that while many people take their medications without a problem, as many as 700,000 Americans wind up in the emergency room each year because of adverse reactions to drugs they’ve taken, with 117,000 of those people hospitalized because of reactions.The Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute is currently conducting a prospective study to characterize the problem in Canada and to identify strategies to reduce and prevent adverse drug-related events The implementation of strategies to reduce these events will not only improve patient safety but may ultimately reduce emergency department overcrowding, reduce morbidity as well as costs to the Canadian health care system. More initiatives are needed to develop practices that will avoid preventable adverse drug reactions.